Attorney General v Jenkins et al.
Let it be Enquired for the Lord Proprietary whether
John Jenkins
Hugh Neile
William Heard
Henry Peere
Richard Morris
William
Smoote
John Courts
James Walker
William Hall,
William Crayford
Thomas Jarvis
Thomas Lomax and
John Morris
contrary to the
fidellity to his Lops due not having the feare of God before their
Eyes, and by Instigacōn of the devell, mutinously and seditiously
Contrary to the Acte of Assembly in that case provided within this
Province at the howse of Josias Fendall in Charles County upon the
Eighth and nynth dayes of February 1660 agt the psonof his Lops
Governor his governmt & guards provided for the safety thereof did
wth force attempt
tht is to say upon the 8th day of Feb. aforesaid
at the howse of Josias Fendall aforesaid, in the County aforesaid in
Armes did appeare, and upon the ninth day of February to rescue
the psons of Josias Fendall and John Hatch then Prisoners for
mutiny and Sedicōn pland under a guard did march in greate derrogacōn [partial repeal of the law] from the just power of his Lopand the Subversion of the
Government of this Province and Contrary to the peace of his said
Lop his rule and dominion.
Then order was given to the Sherriffe to Impannell a Jury (vizt)
as followeth
Mr Richard Lloyd
Mr John Warren
William Tattershall
Walter Pakes
Wm Browne
Nicholas Young Foreman
John Shertcliffe
Richard Bennett
William Assiter
Gent:
Randall Hanson
John Waghope
James Hall
Henry Ellery
John Vanhack
Wm Lucas
Geo. Wilson
Wm Cole
Thomas Innis
The Jury retournes their Verdict as followeth (vizt)
And the Indictment agt
John Jenkins
Hugh Neile
William Heard
Henry Peere
Richard Morris
William Smoote
John Courts
William
Hall
William Crayford
Thomas Jarvis
Thomas Lomax and
John
Morris
was found Billa vera [a true bill]
James Walker (Ignoramus)
John
Jenkins
Hugh Neile and
Henry Peere
being five tymes called did
not appeare.
Richard Morris
William Smoote
John Courts and
John Morris
were called to the Barre and had their Indictmt read . . .
And the Jury retourned their Verdict not Guilty
The Examinacõn of Thomas Lomax resideing at Capt Josias Fendalls howse in Charles County aged thirty yeares or thereabouts
taken before
the honoble
Philip Calvert Esqr Governor of this Province of Maryland
Robert Clarke and
Baker Brookes Esqrs two of his
Lops Councell for the said Province
the 18th day of February 1660
The said Examinant being demanded whether the under menconed
writts, vizt
one of them agt Mr John Anderton at the Suite of James
Bowling dated the thirtyth of July 1660 and Signed by the said
Josias Fendall, but written by him
and other foure writts
one agt Hugh Stanley at the Suite of Thomas Burdett,
another agt the saidThomas Burdett at the Suite of Thomas Trueman,
another to Sumons Henry Coursey to testefye on the behalfe of John Bateman in a
cause depending Betweene the said Bateman and Bagby .... Brookes
to testefye on the behalfe ....
And whether by the said Fendall or
not, he answered they were, And the said Examinat being further
shewed a certaine pretended order of Councell held at Thomas
Gerrards and a proclamacon thereupon of the same date were
written by him and Signed by the said Fendall respectively he
answered they were
And further sayth that there being thirty Six
men in Armes in the feild before Captaine Fendalls howse was
desired by that party of men to drawe a peticōn to the Governor that
they were Subjects to the King of England
And if they comitted
what was not fitt that they should be tryed by the Lawes of England
which peticōn this Examinat did drawe but being asked where is that
peticōn he answered he doth not knowe.
Philip Calvert
Robert Clarke
Baker Brooke
The Examinacon of John Hatton Servant to Josias Fendall aged
forty yeares or thereabouts being duely Sworne and Examined
before
the honoble the Governor Philip Calvert Esqr
Henry Coursey
Secretcy
Robert Clarke. Baker Brooks and John Bateman Esqrs
of his Lops Councell
the 18th day of February 1660
Sayth that he heard his said Master Josias Fendall say
that on
Monday the fourth of this instant February he was at the howse of
Robert Hunley
that upon Sattirday the ninth day of February he
sawe Captaine John Jenkins with aboute 40 men at the howse of
Josias Fendall where the said Jenkins desired the said men to drawe
out in two single fyles they being then all Armed to march downe to
the pesent Governor, but for what purpose this depont knoweth not
And further sayth that Hugh Neile and William Heard with others
of the said Company whose names he knowes not went to a boate and
this depont heard went to the East side of Wiccocomaco River but
sudainly after retourned back againe and further sayth that he
knowes Hugh Neile did ride on Captaine Fendalls horse to Portoback but to what purpose he knowes not
And further sayth not
Jur. coram nobis [in your presence]
Philip Calvert
Henry Coursey
Robert Clarke
Baker Brooke
The Examinacon of John Balth [Balch] Servant to Capt Fendall aged
thirty yeares or thereabouts said Captaine Fendalls howse being on
Sunday the third day of February his said Master did ride abroad
but whither knowes not
And upon Fryday following aboute Eight in
the morning Captaine John Jenkins with aboute thirty men all armed
came to the said Fendalls howse and he then sawe them drawe out
into two single fyles but whether it was Captaine Jenkins or Hugh
Neile comanded them he knowes not, but he rather thinkes it was
Hugh Neile
And sayth that he sawe William Heard and some others
of the said Company goe over the River in a Boate
And that John
Courts was at the said Fendalls in Armes till night that he this
depont went to Bedd.
And further sayth not but that the Bulletts he
had given to William Potter he .... from the said Fendalls
Overseer
John Balch, his marke
Jur. coram nobis
Philip Calvert
Henry Coursey
Robt Clarke
Baker
Brooke.